Who writes this
You are about to take numbers off this site and put water in a vial with them. So you should know who is behind it, and how those numbers got here. That is what this page is for.
The short version
Reconstitute Editorial is a small independent editorial project. It started in August 2026. It publishes one thing: what is in a peptide vial, and the arithmetic for mixing and measuring it.
We are not doctors, we are not a pharmacy, and we are not a lab. Nobody here is going to tell you what to take. What we can do is read labels and papers carefully, do the arithmetic correctly, and show our work every time.
We publish under an editorial name rather than a personal one. Everything on this site is checkable without knowing who typed it: every figure names its source, and you can open that source yourself. That is the standard we would rather be judged on.
Method
Every figure gets a grade, and the grade decides what we may do with it.
Most sites in this space print a number and move on. We grade each one first, because where a number came from decides whether it is safe to calculate with.
- Supplier pageWe may calculate with it3 figures
A figure printed on a page we opened ourselves — a supplier spec sheet or an FDA label.
- LiteratureWe may calculate with it0 figures
A figure from a published paper we opened and read, with its PMID on the page.
- Community consensusWe never calculate with it5 figures
A figure several independent community sources agree on, with no label or paper behind it.
- Not sourcedWe never calculate with it2 figures
We went looking and could not find one.
This is not a promise on a page — it is a rule in the code, and a test fails the build if any compound breaks it. We know because we broke it ourselves once: a community figure for KPV got wired into the solver and sat there for three commits before anyone noticed. The test exists because writing the rule down was not enough.
Limits
What this site will not do.
No quantities, no schedules.
The calculators convert the units and volumes you type in. They never suggest how much to take or how often.
No shop, no vendor list, no affiliate links.
We do not sell anything and we are not paid when you buy anything. That is not going to change.
No invented numbers.
If we could not find a source, the page says so and the feature that needed it is off. There is no use-by date anywhere on this site for exactly that reason.
No account, no email wall.
Everything works without signing in. Nothing you type leaves your browser.
Every figure, and where we got it
3 sourced · 5 consensus · 2 missing
This is the whole list, including the gaps. The missing rows are the point: each one names a feature we switched off rather than a number we made up.
| Figure | Value | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| GHK-Cu solubility in waterMedChemExpress product page — Cross-checked: MW 401.91 → 124.41 mM, matches the stated molarity. | 50 mg/mL | Supplier page |
| BPC-157 solubility in waterMedChemExpress product page — Cross-checked: MW 1419.54 → 70.45 mM, matches. A search snippet claiming 2.5 mg/mL was wrong by 40×. | ≥ 100 mg/mL | Supplier page |
| TB-500 solubility in waterMedChemExpress product page (opened 2026-08-20) — Cross-checked: MW 889.01 → 224.97 mM, matches exactly. Upgraded from a search snippet. | ≥ 200 mg/mL | Supplier page |
| KPV solubilityCayman Chemical product page 45458 (opened 2026-08-20) — A qualitative band in PBS, not a measured maximum in water. Not used in any calculation — the low end implies more water than the vial holds. Automatic water volume stays off for KLOW. | 1–10 mg/mL | Community consensus |
| Glow compositionFive independent community sources agreed — Community blends are not branded products; ratios vary by supplier. | 70 mg — GHK-Cu 50 / BPC-157 10 / TB-500 10 | Community consensus |
| KLOW compositionThree independent community sources agreed — Arithmetically self-consistent: 50 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 80 mg. | 80 mg — GHK-Cu 50 / KPV 10 / BPC-157 10 / TB-500 10 | Community consensus |
| Wolverine compositionCommunity sources, 1:1 ratio — The weakest of the three. Some suppliers label a 10 mg vial as 5 + 5. | 20 mg — BPC-157 10 / TB-500 10 | Community consensus |
| Storage temperature after mixingCommunity practice, consistent across sources — GHK-Cu is light sensitive, so Glow and KLOW should be kept dark. | 2–8 °C, protected from light | Community consensus |
| Shelf life after mixing (beyond-use date)Not found for domestic-fridge conditions — Suppliers publish −80 °C / −20 °C freezer figures only. Consequence: no expiry date anywhere on this site. | — | Not sourced |
| Maximum volume per drawNot found — Consequence: the volume filter is skipped. Draws over 1 mL are flagged, never blocked. | — | Not sourced |
Found something wrong?
Tell us. A source we missed is the most useful thing you can send — listing our sources is the whole point, and a gap we can close is a feature we can switch back on. Corrections to corrections@reconstitute.online.
We have already corrected this site in public once. An earlier version of KLOW vs Glow claimed KLOW gives you a smaller share of every shared component. That was false — we checked the arithmetic, found it identical to three decimal places, and rewrote the page. The note is still there.
Last reviewed
The compounds described here are research chemicals, not approved medicines. Nothing on this site is medical advice. Talk to a licensed healthcare provider before you make any health decision.